From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mucci v. Ruggerio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1987
133 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

October 26, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The conclusory statements offered by the injured plaintiff and her doctor in their affidavits in opposition to the defendant's motion for summary judgment fail to establish a prima facie case of "serious injury" (Spangenberg v. Dombrowski, 114 A.D.2d 497, 498; see, Post v. Broderick, 104 A.D.2d 977). Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mucci v. Ruggerio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1987
133 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Mucci v. Ruggerio

Case Details

Full title:DONNA M. MUCCI et al., Respondents, v. TIMOTHY N. RUGGERIO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Gleason v. Huber

ay not be considered in support of the defendants' motion (see, Pagano v Kingsbury, 182 A.D.2d 268; Jacondino…