From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MTGLQ Inv'rs v. Wellington

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Jul 8, 2024
No. 17-CV-487-KG-LF (D.N.M. Jul. 8, 2024)

Opinion

17-CV-487-KG-LF

07-08-2024

MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP, Plaintiff, v. MONICA L. WELLINGTON, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff-Movant MTGLQ Investors, LP's and Movant Solomon S. Krotzer's Motion for Judicial Notice and Supplement to Motions for Judicial Notice and Request for Preliminary Injunction. (Docs. 307, 326). Pursuant to Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the Court grants the Motion and Supplement to Motions.

Because the judicial notice includes the full docket and filings made in the New Mexico state court case, Wellington v. Krotzer, case no. D-202-CV-2023-05422, and David Wellington's and Cyprexx Services, LLC's Requests for Judicial Notice also request the Court take judicial notice of filings in the state court case, see (Docs. 324, 325), their requests for judicial notice are denied as moot.

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

MTGLQ Inv'rs v. Wellington

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Jul 8, 2024
No. 17-CV-487-KG-LF (D.N.M. Jul. 8, 2024)
Case details for

MTGLQ Inv'rs v. Wellington

Case Details

Full title:MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP, Plaintiff, v. MONICA L. WELLINGTON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Jul 8, 2024

Citations

No. 17-CV-487-KG-LF (D.N.M. Jul. 8, 2024)