From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. AIG Prop. Cas. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 29, 2021
20 CIVIL 2102 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 2102 (VEC)

03-29-2021

MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, a Delaware entity, Plaintiff, v. AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY, a New York for-profit corporation, AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY, INC., a Delaware corporation, and LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware company, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 26, 2021, Plaintiff has not alleged that it has Article III standing. Accordingly, Defendants' Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is GRANTED. Defendants' motions to strike class allegations and for costs are DENIED as moot. See Dkts. 22, 24. The Court declines to grant Plaintiff leave to amend again its complaint. The Court has already allowed Plaintiff to amend once and is disinclined to do so again. See Order, Dkt. 54; see also Ruotolo v. City of New York, 514 F.3d 184, 191 (2d Cir. 2008) (noting that leave to amend may be properly denied for "repeated failure to cure deficiencies."). If this were the first of this type of case that Plaintiff had filed, the Court might be inclined to give it another shot at adequately alleging standing. But this is far from Plaintiff's first rodeo. Plaintiff has brought many of these cases around the country and was, therefore, "on notice from the outset that the issue of standing would be front and center." State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2019 WL 6311987, at *9. Because Plaintiff has had plenty of trial runs and has already amended its complaint against these Defendants once, the Court declines to grant leave to amend again as it would be futile. This matter is hereby dismissed without prejudice. See John v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 858 F.3d 732, 735 (2d Cir. 2017) ("[W]here a complaint is dismissed for lack of Article III standing, the dismissal must be without prejudice, rather than with prejudice.") (cleaned up); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 29, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. AIG Prop. Cas. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 29, 2021
20 CIVIL 2102 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2021)
Case details for

MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. AIG Prop. Cas. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, a Delaware entity, Plaintiff, v. AIG…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 29, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 2102 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2021)