From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MQ Target Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
Nov 29, 2011
MASTER CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

MASTER CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ CASE NO. 10-cv-4945-SI, MQ MDL NO. 1827

11-29-2011

In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No. 10-cv-4945 SI, MQ Target Corp., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE) Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062) Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756) CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP Counsel for Defendants LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC. LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. Jason C. Murray (State Bar No. 169806) Nathanial J. Wood (State Bar No. 223547) CROWELL & MORING LLP Counsel for Plaintiff NEWEGG INC.


Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE)

Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062)

Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756)

CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP

Counsel for Defendants

LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.

LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.

Jason C. Murray (State Bar No. 169806)

Nathanial J. Wood (State Bar No. 223547)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

Counsel for Plaintiff

NEWEGG INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER PERMITTING DEPOSITION OF

MANDY WANG BEYOND DISCOVERY

CUTOFF DATE

Plaintiff Newegg Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. ("LG Display Defendants"), parties to the above-entitled action (collectively referred to herein as the "Parties"), hereby stipulate as follows:

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred to discuss scheduling the deposition of Plaintiff's employee, Mandy Wang, for several weeks now;

WHEREAS, Ms. Wang is not available for a deposition before the discovery cutoff date of December 8, 2011;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to make Ms. Wang available for a deposition after the discovery cutoff as set forth below, if the LG Display Defendants choose to notice her deposition;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their undersigned respective counsel, stipulate and request that the Court order as follows:

1. That the discovery cutoff date of December 8, 2011, be extended for the sole purpose of the aforementioned, proposed deposition; and

2. That the LG Display Defendants may take the deposition of Mandy Wang on or between January 16, 2012 and January 31, 2012, or, if Ms. Wang remains unavailable during that period, on a date or dates to be determined by mutual agreement between the Parties.

By: Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE)

Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062)

Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756)

CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP

Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co. Ltd and LG

Display America, Inc.

By: Jason C. Murray (State Bar No. 169806)

Nathanial J. Wood (State Bar No. 223547)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

Counsel for Plaintiff Newegg Inc.

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

By: Michael R. Lazerwitz

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Under the parties' stipulation set forth above, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Susan Illston

United States District Judge


Summaries of

MQ Target Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
Nov 29, 2011
MASTER CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)
Case details for

MQ Target Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No. 10-cv-4945 SI…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

MASTER CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)