From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moyer v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 25, 2009
No. CIV S-03-1350 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-1350 FCD DAD P.

March 25, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 6, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion for substitution or appointment of counsel, claiming that his attorney, Daniel N. Kassabian, had a conflict of interest. On February 18, 2009, plaintiff substituted Marc D. Peters, Daniel Wan, and Yuka Teraguchi as counsel of record in this action in place of attorney Kassabian. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for substitution or appointment of counsel will be denied as moot.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 6, 2009 motion for substitution or appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 66) is denied as moot.


Summaries of

Moyer v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 25, 2009
No. CIV S-03-1350 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Moyer v. Tilton

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE R. MOYER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES E. TILTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 25, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-03-1350 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2009)