From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moyer v. Kirkpatrick

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jan 4, 1968
387 F.2d 955 (3d Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 16622.

Argued November 8, 1967.

Decided January 4, 1968.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Alfred L. Luongo, Judge.

John J. O'Brien, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Nicholas G. Petrella, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

Geoffrey J. Cunniff, Bala Cynwyd, Pa. (Wilderman, Markowitz Kirschner, Richard Kirschner, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


The appellant plaintiffs, members of Bricklayers Local No. 12, Chester, Pa., filed a Complaint in the District Court for a declaratory judgment, alleging that the defendant appellees, trustees of a jointly administered health and welfare fund ("Fund") acted improperly in refusing to accept payments into the Fund from non-member, non-subscribing employers, and in setting certain requirements for eligibility for benefits. The Complaint based jurisdiction on the Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act, as amended.

29 U.S.C.A. 308(c).

The District Court dismissed the Complaint for lack of jurisdiction, and alternatively, for failure of the Complaint to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court dismissing the Complaint will be affirmed for the reasons so well-stated by Judge Luongo in his Opinion reported at 265 F. Supp. 348 (1967).


Summaries of

Moyer v. Kirkpatrick

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jan 4, 1968
387 F.2d 955 (3d Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Moyer v. Kirkpatrick

Case Details

Full title:Budd MOYER, and John Gray, on Behalf of Themselves and the Other Members…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jan 4, 1968

Citations

387 F.2d 955 (3d Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

Snider v. All State Administrators, Inc.

In thus limiting its judicial function to the grant of injunctive relief against future diversion of trust…