From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moye v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 18, 1990
168 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 18, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lewis R. Friedman, J.).


Plaintiffs sought damages from defendant for the wrongful death of their son who committed suicide on Rikers Island in 1982. The action was commenced in May 1983. The action was marked off calendar on March 20, 1987, for plaintiffs' failure to attend a pretrial conference. Plaintiffs' counsel claimed that he had hired a calendar checking service and regularly read the New York Law Journal, but only learned that the case had been marked off in November 1989, at which time the motion was brought to vacate the default.

Cases which are not diligently pursued will be dismissed automatically one year after stricken from the calendar (CPLR 3404; Rosser v. Scacalossi, 140 A.D.2d 318). The presumption that an action so dismissed has been abandoned is rebuttable, and the action may be restored upon a showing of a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the delay, a lack of prejudice to the opposing party, and a lack of intent to abandon the action (Rodriguez v. Middle Atl. Auto Leasing, 122 A.D.2d 720, appeal dismissed 69 N.Y.2d 874).

Plaintiffs did not satisfy all these criteria. The attorney's affirmation accompanied by copies of the pleadings was insufficient to demonstrate a meritorious cause of action; the suicide report annexed to the papers implies neither negligence nor causation (see, e.g., Bergan v. Home for Incurables, 124 A.D.2d 517). Nor did counsel present a sufficient explanation to excuse the three-year delay in moving to restore the action. Finally, the plaintiffs did not demonstrate that defendant has not been prejudiced by the delay.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Carro, Asch, Wallach and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Moye v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 18, 1990
168 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Moye v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL MOYE et al., Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 664

Citing Cases

Zabari v. City of New York

CPLR 3404 provides that a case in Supreme Court that has been marked off or struck from the calendar and not…

Weiss v. City of New York

Nevertheless, the IAS Court found that plaintiff had failed to rebut the presumption of abandonment arising…