Opinion
Nos. 05-09-01508-CR, 05-09-01509-CR, 05-09-01510-CR, 05-09-01511-CR
Opinion Filed June 23, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No's. F-0900271-L, F-0872449-L, F-0855121-L, F-0856599-L.
Before Justices RICHTER, LANG-MIERS, and MYERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD MOYA appeals his convictions for retaliation, two counts of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, and burglary of a vehicle with two previous convictions. Punishment was assessed at twenty years' imprisonment for each offense. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.