From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moya v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Feb 14, 2014
NO. 03-13-00320-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 14, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 03-13-00320-CR

02-14-2014

Javier Cabrera Moya, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR2012-263, HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Javier Cabrera Moya appeals from his open plea of guilty to the first-degree felony offense of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in penalty group 1 (methamphetamine), 400 grams or more, enhanced by his pleading of true to prior felony convictions. See Tex. Health & Safety Code §§ 481.102(6), 481.112(f). After a hearing, the trial court assessed punishment at 58 years and 310 days of imprisonment. The trial court certified Moya's right to appeal the question of punishment.

Moya's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief addressing each of these appeals and concluding that these appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record in these causes demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See id.; see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684, 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553, 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel sent a copy of the brief to Moya and advised him of his right to examine the appellate record in this cause and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. Moya did not file a pro se brief and did not request an extension of time to do so.

We have reviewed the record in this cause and find no reversible error. See Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that this appeal is frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________

Jeff Rose, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Rose, and Goodwin Affirmed Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Moya v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Feb 14, 2014
NO. 03-13-00320-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Moya v. State

Case Details

Full title:Javier Cabrera Moya, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Feb 14, 2014

Citations

NO. 03-13-00320-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 14, 2014)