Opinion
Submitted June 19, 1894
Decided June 22, 1894
De Forest Brothers for appellant.
W.J. Groo for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion of BARNARD, J., below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Moxley v. New Jersey and New York Railroad Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 22, 1894
37 N.E. 640 (N.Y. 1894)
Summaries of
Moxley v. New Jersey and New York Railroad Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 22, 1894
37 N.E. 640 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for
Moxley v. New Jersey and New York Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:DENNIS MOXLEY, Respondent, v . NEW JERSEY AND NEW YORK RAILROAD COMPANY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 22, 1894
Citations
37 N.E. 640 (N.Y. 1894)
143 N.Y. 649
Citing Cases
Greenfarb v. R.S.K. Realty Corp.
It has been held that the burdens and benefits of covenants to maintain fences on boundary lines between…
523 E. Fifth St. Hous. Pres. Dev. FundThe covenant is unlike covenants to supply water, to pay money, to build fences along boundary lines, to…