From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mowry v. Zapara

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Nov 12, 2009
No. 29914 (Haw. Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2009)

Opinion

No. 29914

November 12, 2009.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 5RC08-1-0316)

By: NAKAMURA, Chief Judge, WATANABE and LEONARD, JJ.


ORDER DENYING NOVEMBER 3, 2009 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE OCTOBER 23, 2009 ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Upon review of (1) the October 23, 2009 order dismissing this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, (2) Defendants-Appellants Michael A. Zapara and Gina A. Zapara's (the Zapara Appellants) November 3, 2009 motion for reconsideration of the October 23, 2009 order of dismissal pursuant to Rule 40 of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP), and (3) the record, it appears that the Zapara Appellants' November 3, 2009 HRAP Rule 40 motion for reconsideration is untimely because the Zapara Appellants' did not file their November 3, 2009 HRAP Rule 40 motion for reconsideration within ten days after the filing of the October 23, 2009 order of dismissal, as HRAP Rule 40(a) required. It further appears that we have not misapprehended or overlooked any material points of law or fact when we entered the October 23, 2009 order of dismissal. Even if, as asserted by the Zapora Appellants, their notice of appeal was received by the circuit court on June 5, 2009, it is untimely. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Zapara Appellants' November 3, 2009 HRAP Rule 40 motion for reconsideration of the October 23, 2009 order of dismissal is denied.


Summaries of

Mowry v. Zapara

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Nov 12, 2009
No. 29914 (Haw. Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Mowry v. Zapara

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM F. MOWRY and MARTHA J. MOWRY, Trustees of the William F. Mowry…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii

Date published: Nov 12, 2009

Citations

No. 29914 (Haw. Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2009)