From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moure v. Moure

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 1, 2015
174 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 2D14–4824.

05-01-2015

Brian Campbell MOURE, Appellant, v. Susan Crisp MOURE, Appellee.

RaeAnn Compton and Jake Walter Hannaway of RaeAnn Compton, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Andrew J. Rodnite, Jr. of Reeser, Rodnite, Outten & Zdravko, LLC., Palm Harbor, for Appellee.


RaeAnn Compton and Jake Walter Hannaway of RaeAnn Compton, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Andrew J. Rodnite, Jr. of Reeser, Rodnite, Outten & Zdravko, LLC., Palm Harbor, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. See Wetherington v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 661 So.2d 1276, 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). (“While the trial court's order does result in a de facto transfer of venue for one case, we do not agree that this ‘Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Consolidate’ becomes an order concerning venue for the jurisdictional purpose of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.139(a)(3)(A).”).

VILLANTI, C.J., and SLEET and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Moure v. Moure

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 1, 2015
174 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Moure v. Moure

Case Details

Full title:Brian Campbell MOURE, Appellant, v. Susan Crisp MOURE, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: May 1, 2015

Citations

174 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)