From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mountcastle v. Caliber Home Loans

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 29, 2016
647 F. App'x 223 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-2380

04-29-2016

CHARLOTTE D. MOUNTCASTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS; FLAGSTAR BANK, Defendants - Appellees.

Charlotte D. Mountcastle, Appellant Pro Se. Lela Marie Ames, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Washington, D.C.; Christine Marie Debevec, STRADLEY RONON STEVENS & YOUNG, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00169-RBS-RJK) Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charlotte D. Mountcastle, Appellant Pro Se. Lela Marie Ames, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Washington, D.C.; Christine Marie Debevec, STRADLEY RONON STEVENS & YOUNG, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charlotte D. Mountcastle appeals the district court's order dismissing her amended complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mountcastle v. Caliber Home Loans, No. 2:15-cv-00169-RBS-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Mountcastle v. Caliber Home Loans

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 29, 2016
647 F. App'x 223 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Mountcastle v. Caliber Home Loans

Case Details

Full title:CHARLOTTE D. MOUNTCASTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 29, 2016

Citations

647 F. App'x 223 (4th Cir. 2016)