From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moultrie v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Feb 23, 2012
C/R No.: 2:10-1197 DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2012)

Opinion

C/R No.: 2:10-1197 DCN

02-23-2012

LASONIA D. MOULTRIE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

This matter is before the court upon petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a response to government's motion to dismiss and to furnish transcripts at no cost. The motion was filed on February 22, 2011.

Longstanding circuit precedents have provided that a prisoner who requests free copies of records in his or her criminal case, whether it is a state case or a federal case, must show a particularized need for such records. Jones v. Superintendent, Virginia State Farm, 460 F.2d 150, 152-153 & nn. 3-4 (4th Cir. 1972), adhered to, 465 F.2d 1091, 1092-1096 (4th Cir. 1972)(denying rehearing en banc), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 944 (1973). A state or federal prisoner does not have the right to request free transcripts so that he or she can search the record of conviction to find possible flaws. See United States v. Glass, 317 F.2d 200, 202 (4th Cir. 1963)("An indigent is not entitled to a transcript at government expense without a showing of need, merely to comb the record in the hope of discovering some flaw."); and United States v. Shoaf, 341 F.2d 832, 833-836 & nn. 1-6 (4th Cir. 1964)(reaffirming Glass). The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina has also applied those precedents in cases where state prisoners have sought orders from this court to direct courts of the State of South Carolina to provide them free transcripts. See, e.g., Ham v. Leeke, 459 F. Supp. 459, 462-463 & n. 11 (D.S.C. 1978), appeal dismissed, 586 F.2d 837 (4th Cir. 1978)[Table].

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the Motion for Extension of Time to file a response is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have until April 15, 2012 to file a response to government's Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Motion to Furnish Transcripts at No Cost is DENIED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

David C. Norton

United States District Judge

February 23, 2012

Charleston, South Carolina


Summaries of

Moultrie v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Feb 23, 2012
C/R No.: 2:10-1197 DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Moultrie v. United States

Case Details

Full title:LASONIA D. MOULTRIE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Feb 23, 2012

Citations

C/R No.: 2:10-1197 DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2012)