From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moultrie v. Rozum

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 19, 2008
Case No. 3:07-cv-224-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07-cv-224-KRG-KAP.

August 19, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on July 31, 2008, docket no. 20, recommending that the plaintiff's motion to withdraw the complaint without prejudice, docket no. 19, be granted under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) as a motion to dismiss with prejudice.

The parties were notified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), that they had ten days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record of this matter and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and noting the absence of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2008, it is

ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Moultrie v. Rozum

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 19, 2008
Case No. 3:07-cv-224-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Moultrie v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MOULTRIE, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT GERALD ROZUM, S.C.I. SOMERSET…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 19, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:07-cv-224-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2008)