From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Motors Insurance Corporation v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jun 8, 1956
291 S.W.2d 522 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956)

Summary

In Motors Insurance Corporation v. Howard, Ky., 291 S.W.2d 522, we recognized that under certain circumstances an insurer may be liable for damages due to unreasonable delay in settling a pending claim.

Summary of this case from Service Casualty Company of New York v. Marcum

Opinion

June 8, 1956.

Appeal from the Magoffin Circuit Court, John Chris Cornett, J.

Earl R. Cooper, Salyersville, for appellant.

Marcus Mann, Salyersville, for appellee.


A judgment, pursuant to a jury's verdict, was entered in favor of Gaines Howard against Motors Insurance Corporation for $500 for damages to a truck and $1,500 for loss of the use of the truck, resulting from an alleged unreasonable delay in making the repairs. This motion for appeal concerns only the latter part of the judgment.

There was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict for $1,500. The question was submitted to the jury properly under Instruction No. 3. We do not reach other alleged errors in the instructions, since they were not saved by timely objection. See CR 51, and Struetker v. Neiser, Ky., 290 S.W.2d 781, and cases cited therein.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Motors Insurance Corporation v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jun 8, 1956
291 S.W.2d 522 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956)

In Motors Insurance Corporation v. Howard, Ky., 291 S.W.2d 522, we recognized that under certain circumstances an insurer may be liable for damages due to unreasonable delay in settling a pending claim.

Summary of this case from Service Casualty Company of New York v. Marcum
Case details for

Motors Insurance Corporation v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:MOTORS INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Gaines HOWARD, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Jun 8, 1956

Citations

291 S.W.2d 522 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956)

Citing Cases

Service Casualty Company of New York v. Marcum

The Company contends that the court erred in permitting Marcum to recover damages for the loss of the use of…

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Judd

" That conclusion is in accordance with what we consider to be the correct legal premise. Motors Insurance…