Opinion
Case No. 5D19-2252
03-27-2020
MOTOR WERKS, LLC, Appellant, v. MOTO WERKS, LLC, Appellee.
David A. Baker and Mark A. Cavins, of Law Office of David A. Baker, P.A., Rockledge, for Appellant. Charles Allen Schillinger, of Schillinger & Coleman, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellee.
David A. Baker and Mark A. Cavins, of Law Office of David A. Baker, P.A., Rockledge, for Appellant.
Charles Allen Schillinger, of Schillinger & Coleman, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Motor Werks, LLC ("Motor"), appeals the trial court's amended order requiring it to pay arrears to Moto Werks, LLC ("MWerks"). On appeal, Motor argues that MWerks recovered twice for the same debt. Following a review of the record, we conclude that Motor failed to present that argument below. Thus, this issue is not preserved for appeal. Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d 925, 928 (Fla. 2005) ("In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved." (quoting Tillman v. State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1985) )).
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, COHEN and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.