From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Motlow v. McNeil

United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Pierce Division
Sep 30, 2010
Case No. 09-14157-CIV-GRAHAM/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Sep. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 09-14157-CIV-GRAHAM/GOODMAN.

September 30, 2010


ORDER


THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant Bhadja's motions for summary judgment [D.E. 79] and to dismiss for failure to prosecute and comply with pretrial order [D.E. 85].

THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman [D.E. 86]. Plaintiff alleges denial of medical care under the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant delayed needed medical treatment on his left eye. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report [D.E. 89] finding that Plaintiff's failure to file a pretrial statement as required by Court order; failure to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and failure to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, demonstrated abandonment of this lawsuit. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal for lack of prosecution.

The Magistrate Judge also found that in the alternative to dismissing this action for lack of prosecution, Bhadja's motion for summary judgment be granted. Specifically, the Magistrate Judge found that the record evidence does not support a claim against Defendant Bhadja for denial of medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment because Defendant did not know of Plaintiff's eye problems. Plaintiff did not file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report.

THE COURT has conducted an independent review of the file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Goodman's Report [D.E. 89] is RATIFIED, AFFIRMED and APPROVED in its entirety. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Bhadja's Motion for Summary Judgment [D.E. 79] is Granted. Alternatively, Defendant Bhadja's Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 85] is Granted. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED and any pending motions are denied as MOOT. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 29th day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Motlow v. McNeil

United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Pierce Division
Sep 30, 2010
Case No. 09-14157-CIV-GRAHAM/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Sep. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Motlow v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:ADAM J. MOTLOW, Plaintiff, v. WALTER McNEIL, ET AL., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Pierce Division

Date published: Sep 30, 2010

Citations

Case No. 09-14157-CIV-GRAHAM/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Sep. 30, 2010)