From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mote v. Seitz

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jul 23, 1963
132 S.E.2d 79 (Ga. 1963)

Opinion

22104.

SUBMITTED JULY 8, 1963.

DECIDED JULY 23, 1963.

Location of land line. Lumpkin Superior Court. Before Judge Burtz.

Herbert Edmondson, for plaintiff in error.

Everett C. Brannon, Jr., Jeff C. Wayne, Brannon, Brannon Schroeder, Telford, Wayne Smith, contra.


The parties to this litigation are conterminous landowners. On the trial, they agreed and stipulated in open court that the only issue to be determined was the location of the dividing line between their respective lands; and since by that agreement and stipulation they eliminated all questions involved in the case except the one which relates only to the dividing line between their adjacent lands, the Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction of the writ of error. See Whaley v. Ellis, 209 Ga. 147 ( 71 S.E.2d 209) and the cases there cited.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED JULY 8, 1963 — DECIDED JULY 23, 1963.


Summaries of

Mote v. Seitz

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jul 23, 1963
132 S.E.2d 79 (Ga. 1963)
Case details for

Mote v. Seitz

Case Details

Full title:MOTE, by NEXT FRIEND v. SEITZ

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jul 23, 1963

Citations

132 S.E.2d 79 (Ga. 1963)
132 S.E.2d 79

Citing Cases

Smith v. Morgan

The Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction of cases involving the location of disputed land…

Patterson v. Bailey

Appellant states in his brief that the real issue is the dividing line between the parties' respective…