From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MOTE v. HUMPHREY

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division
Sep 22, 2010
Case No. 1:07-CV-61 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 22, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07-CV-61 (WLS).

September 22, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed September 1, 2010. (Doc. 18). It is recommended that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 2) as well as his Petition to Supplement the Habeas Corpus Petition (Doc. 9) be DENIED based on Petitioner's failure to satisfy his burden for federal habeas corpus relief. (Doc. 18) No objection to Judge Langstaff's Report and Recommendation has been filed to date.

Upon full review and consideration of the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 2) and Petition to Supplement the Habeas Corpus Petition are DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MOTE v. HUMPHREY

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division
Sep 22, 2010
Case No. 1:07-CV-61 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 22, 2010)
Case details for

MOTE v. HUMPHREY

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE LEE MOTE, Petitioner, v. CARL HUMPHREY, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division

Date published: Sep 22, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:07-CV-61 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 22, 2010)