From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez Mota v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 8, 2008
548 F.3d 1308 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-71880.

December 8, 2008.

Evangeline G. Abriel, Legal Analysis, Research, and Writing, Eugenio Ramos, Director, Santa Clara University School of Law, Santa Clara, CA, for Petitioner.

Constantina Ramirez Mota, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of The District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Paul Fiorino, Esquire, Ari Nazarov, Esquire, Ann Carroll Varnon, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Office of The District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: DAVID R. THOMPSON and KIM McLANE WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and BARRY T. MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.

The Honorable Barry T. Moskowitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. 16065


ORDER

The parties having advised this court that they have exhausted attempts to settle this case, and the court's Circuit Mediator having advised the court that mediation proceedings have terminated, and the parties having requested that the mandate now issue,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the mandate in this case shall issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Ramirez Mota v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 8, 2008
548 F.3d 1308 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Ramirez Mota v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Constantina RAMIREZ MOTA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 2008

Citations

548 F.3d 1308 (9th Cir. 2008)