From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mota v. Loveridge

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 2024
Civil Action 23-1121 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 23-1121

01-03-2024

SANTOS CASTRO MOTA, Petitioner, v. LESLIE LOVERIDGE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ROBERT MANZI, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MICHELLE HENRY, Respondents.


ORDER

HON. KAI N. SCOTT UNITED STATES DISTINCT COURT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2023, upon careful and independent consideration of Santos Castro Mota's petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 2), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret, and no objections having been filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED; and

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Mota v. Loveridge

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 2024
Civil Action 23-1121 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Mota v. Loveridge

Case Details

Full title:SANTOS CASTRO MOTA, Petitioner, v. LESLIE LOVERIDGE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 3, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 23-1121 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2024)