From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mostafa v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 31, 2023
659 S.W.3d 650 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

WD 85048

01-31-2023

Mohamed MOSTAFA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

James Christopher Egan, Columbia, MO for appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, Columbia, MO for respondent.


James Christopher Egan, Columbia, MO for appellant.

Gregory L. Barnes, Columbia, MO for respondent.

Before Division Three: Thomas N. Chapman, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam: Mohamed Adam Mostafa appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mostafa contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness who would have corroborated Mostafa's testimony at trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mostafa v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 31, 2023
659 S.W.3d 650 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Mostafa v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mohamed MOSTAFA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jan 31, 2023

Citations

659 S.W.3d 650 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)