From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MOSS v. VOSS

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 6, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2429 FCD JFM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2429 FCD JFM P.

February 6, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's November 13, 2007 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.


Summaries of

MOSS v. VOSS

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 6, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2429 FCD JFM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2008)
Case details for

MOSS v. VOSS

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE SHERWOOD MOSS, Petitioner, v. TOM VOSS, Executive Director, Coalinga…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 6, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2429 FCD JFM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2008)