From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mosqueda v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jun 28, 2013
NO. 03-12-00653-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 28, 2013)

Summary

reviewing record for unassigned fundamental error when appellant could not be located and counsel had sought to abandon appeal

Summary of this case from Carr v. State

Opinion

NO. 03-12-00653-CR

06-28-2013

Frank Mosqueda, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-DC-11-100117, HONORABLE JON WISSER, JUDGE PRESIDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Frank Mosqueda filed his notice of appeal on October 1, 2012, and his brief was due February 11, 2013, but was never filed. This Court sent an overdue-brief notice to Mosqueda's appointed counsel, who failed to provide any response. We then abated the appeal for a trial court hearing to determine whether Mosqueda wished to prosecute this appeal, whether he was indigent, and whether his appointed counsel had abandoned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The trial court notified us that Mosqueda has absconded from supervision and that Mosqueda's counsel, who has been unable to locate or communicate with his client, seeks to abandon this appeal. Under the circumstances, we may consider Mosqueda's appeal without a brief. See id. R. 38.8(b)(4) (authorizing appellate court to "consider the appeal without briefs, as justice may require" when appellant in criminal case fails to file brief).

A grand jury indicted Mosqueda for the third-degree felony offense of family-violence assault. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.02 (b)(2). Mosqueda waived his right to a jury trial and pled not guilty. At the conclusion of the bench trial, the court convicted Mosqueda of family-violence assault and sentenced him to two years' imprisonment. See id.

Because Mosqueda failed to file a brief, no issues are properly before this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f). We have reviewed the record in the interest of justice and found no unassigned fundamental error. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4); Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment of conviction.

____________________

Jeff Rose, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Rose Affirmed Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Mosqueda v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jun 28, 2013
NO. 03-12-00653-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 28, 2013)

reviewing record for unassigned fundamental error when appellant could not be located and counsel had sought to abandon appeal

Summary of this case from Carr v. State

reviewing record for "unassigned fundamental error" when appellant could not be located and counsel had sought to abandon appeal

Summary of this case from Dominguez v. State
Case details for

Mosqueda v. State

Case Details

Full title:Frank Mosqueda, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jun 28, 2013

Citations

NO. 03-12-00653-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 28, 2013)

Citing Cases

Dominguez v. State

ate circumstances to "consider the appeal without briefs, as justice may require"); see also Tex. Code Crim.…

Carr v. State

Under the circumstances, we have considered the appeal without briefs and reviewed the record for unassigned…