From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mosqueda v. Martel

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 5, 2013
2:11-cv-0745 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2013)

Opinion


CARLOS MOSQUEDA, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Respondent. No. 2:11-cv-0745 TLN AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 5, 2013

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 10, 2012, respondent filed an answer which references various lodged documents. The court has not received any lodged documents in this case.

         Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, respondent must furnish the court with copies of relevant transcripts and appellate court briefs and opinions. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, respondent shall lodge copies of the documents referenced in the answer as well as any other documents of record helpful to the resolution of petitioner's claims.


Summaries of

Mosqueda v. Martel

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 5, 2013
2:11-cv-0745 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Mosqueda v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS MOSQUEDA, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 5, 2013

Citations

2:11-cv-0745 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2013)