From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mosley v. Doerer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 1, 2021
2:21-CV-2138-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-2138-DMC-P

12-01-2021

ISAAC D. MOSLEY, Petitioner, v. J. DOERER, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has not filed a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit either a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, with the required certification, or pay the appropriate filing fee. As to the certification requirement, while a copy of Petitioner's prison trust account statement certified by prison officials is not required to satisfy the requirement, such a statement will suffice. Petitioner is warned that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee; and
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Petitioner a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.


Summaries of

Mosley v. Doerer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 1, 2021
2:21-CV-2138-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Mosley v. Doerer

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC D. MOSLEY, Petitioner, v. J. DOERER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-2138-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)