From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mosley v. Cargill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 21, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-00393-KJM-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:19-cv-00393-KJM-CKD P

07-21-2020

MELAN J. MOSLEY Plaintiff, v. STEVE CARGILL, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a California inmate represented by counsel in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed June 11, 2020, plaintiff's first amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: July 21, 2020

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12/mosl0393.fta.docx


Summaries of

Mosley v. Cargill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 21, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-00393-KJM-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Mosley v. Cargill

Case Details

Full title:MELAN J. MOSLEY Plaintiff, v. STEVE CARGILL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 21, 2020

Citations

No. 2:19-cv-00393-KJM-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2020)