From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moses v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Mar 20, 2018
541 S.W.3d 713 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

ED 105670

03-20-2018

Ted G. MOSES, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Nathan J. Aquino, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Nathan J. Aquino, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ted G. Moses, III ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Moses v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Mar 20, 2018
541 S.W.3d 713 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Moses v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ted G. MOSES, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Mar 20, 2018

Citations

541 S.W.3d 713 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)