From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mosch v. Henry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 5, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 5, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB

09-05-2012

ALVIN MOSCH, PATRICIA C. MOSCH, DAVID K. MOSCH, Each Individually and dba Mosch Mining Company, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HENRY, aka John T. Henry, aka John L. Henry, UNITED STATES REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, and any one claiming by or through any of the named persons, Defendants.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a document [Docket No. 102] filed by defendant John Henry. The Court construes the document to be a motion to dismiss and request for default judgment against all plaintiffs. See Docket No. 102 at 3.

The filing lacks a proper caption. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a); D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1J ("The caption format shall be as set forth in Appendix E."); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(2) ("The rules governing captions and other matters of form in pleadings apply to motions and other papers."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a) (requiring that all pleadings have, inter alia, a title). Mr. Henry's motion also lacks a proper signature block, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1K, and is not entirely legible. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1G ("All papers and signatures shall be legible."). Consequently, the Court will strike the motion.

On August 28, 2012, the Court struck a previous filing by Mr. Henry for these and other reasons. See Docket No. 98. Furthermore, in both that order and an August 27, 2012 order, the Court noted that many of Mr. Henry's previous filings in this case violated the Local Rules of this District. If Mr. Henry persists in violating the applicable rules and the Court's orders, the Court may consider whether, in addition to striking non-compliant filings, additional sanctions against Mr. Henry might be in order.

Although the Local Rules do not require filings to be typewritten in "pro se cases," see D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1D, the Court will order Mr. Henry to show cause why his future filings should not be typewritten due to Mr. Henry's repeated filing of illegible handwritten documents and the fact that he is capable of submitting typewritten documents. See, e.g., Docket No. 97.

For the foregoing reasons, it is

ORDERED that Mr. Henry's motion to dismiss and for default judgment against plaintiffs [Docket No. 102] is STRICKEN. Future violations of the applicable rules may subject Mr. Henry to additional sanctions. It is further

ORDERED that, on or before September 19, 2012, Mr. Henry shall show cause why his future filings should not be typewritten.

BY THE COURT:

__________________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mosch v. Henry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 5, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Mosch v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN MOSCH, PATRICIA C. MOSCH, DAVID K. MOSCH, Each Individually and dba…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 5, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 5, 2012)