Opinion
2:23-cv-00993-JAD-DJA
10-16-2023
BALLARD SPAHR LLP John C. Grugan (pro hac vice forthcoming) Jenny N. Perkins (pro hac vice forthcoming) Madeleine Coles Nevada Bar No. 16216 Mitchell Turbenson (pro hac vice forthcoming) Attorneys for Defendants Comerica Bank, Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc., and Conduent Business Services, LLC Evan S. Rothfarb Daniel A. Schlanger SCHLANGER LAW GROUP, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff David J. Moscato and the Putative Class
BALLARD SPAHR LLP John C. Grugan (pro hac vice forthcoming) Jenny N. Perkins (pro hac vice forthcoming) Madeleine Coles Nevada Bar No. 16216 Mitchell Turbenson (pro hac vice forthcoming) Attorneys for Defendants Comerica Bank, Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc., and Conduent Business Services, LLC
Evan S. Rothfarb Daniel A. Schlanger SCHLANGER LAW GROUP, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff David J. Moscato and the Putative Class
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) ECF NO. 25
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the undersigned parties, Plaintiff David J. Moscato (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Comerica Bank, Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc., and Conduent Business Services, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), that the time to file Defendants' Reply Brief in Further Support of their Motion to Dismiss Class Action Complaint filed on September 6, 2023 (ECF No. 10) and currently due on October 12, 2023, is extended to Friday, October 20, 2023. Further, the parties state as follows:
1. The Class Action Complaint was filed on June 27, 2023 (Doc. No. 1).
2. Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss Class Action Complaint on September 6, 2023 (Doc. No. 10).
3. Plaintiff obtained a two-week extension to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and filed their Opposition on October 5, 2023.
4. Defendants' counsel are diligently working on preparing Defendants' Reply Brief in Further Support of their Motion to Dismiss.
4. In the interest of justice and to ensure that the Court receives a well-prepared reply, Defendants request an extension of time to file their reply.
5. Plaintiff, through their counsel, consent to the extension.
6. This is the first request for an extension of time to file a reply in support to Defendants' motion to dismiss.
ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 25] and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' deadline to file their reply in support of the motion to dismiss is extended to October 20, 2023.