From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mory F. v. Hawa K.F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 27, 2021
193 A.D.3d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

13676 Index No. V12944/18 V12945/18 Case No. 2020-00755

04-27-2021

In the Matter of MORY F., Petitioner–Respondent, v. HAWA K.F., Respondent–Appellant. Administration for children's services, Respondent.

The Law Offices of Salihah R. Denman, PLLC, New York (Salihah R. Denman of counsel), for appellant.


The Law Offices of Salihah R. Denman, PLLC, New York (Salihah R. Denman of counsel), for appellant.

Gische, J.P., Kern, Mazzarelli, Kennedy, JJ.

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Maria Arias, J.), entered on or about December 10, 2019, which awarded petitioner father custody of the subject children, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Application by the mother's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 [1967] ; People v. Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833, 384 N.Y.S.2d 161 [1st Dept. 1976] ). A review of the record demonstrates that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. The mother is not aggrieved by the order since she consented to the father having custody of the subject children (see CPLR 5511 ; Matter of Shaniyah D.C. [Olivia C.], 143 A.D.3d 608, 609, 39 N.Y.S.3d 756 [1st Dept. 2016] ), who already resided with him at the time he filed the petition.


Summaries of

Mory F. v. Hawa K.F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 27, 2021
193 A.D.3d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Mory F. v. Hawa K.F.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Mory F., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Hawa K.F.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 27, 2021

Citations

193 A.D.3d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
193 A.D.3d 613
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 2490

Citing Cases

Julie A. v. Myron H.

Moreover, the father consented to awarding the mother physical custody of the subject children and is…

Julie A. v. Myron H.

A review of the record demonstrates that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal.…