Mortimer v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Full title: PAUL MORTIMER, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 11, 1988

754 P.2d 35 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)

754 P.2d 35

Opinion

07-87-394; CA A45528

Argued and submitted April 28,

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed May 11, 1988

Judicial Review from Corrections Division.

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Jan Londahl, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Scott McAlister, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which, inter alia, imposed a fine for violation of a disciplinary rule. He contends that the fine is invalid. It is. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or. App. 85, 750 P.2d 1188 (1988). The other claim of error is without merit.

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.