From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mortenson v. Chook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1957
4 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

July 8, 1957

Present — Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.


In an action to recover damages for injuries to two coats, caused by fire, against the bailee with whom the coats were stored, and his insurance carrier, the carrier appeals from so much of an order of the County Court, Nassau County, as affirmed an order of the City Court of Long Beach, denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint as to it. The motion was made on the ground that the policy provided that "No suit, action or proceeding for the recovery of any claim under this policy shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless the same be commenced within twelve (12) months next after discovery by the Assured of the occurrence which gives rise to the claim." Respondents claim that they did not see the policy nor know the name of the insurance carrier, and were not aware of the 12-month period of limitation within one year after the fire. Respondents instituted their action against the defendant bailee within one year after the fire. Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.


Summaries of

Mortenson v. Chook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1957
4 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Mortenson v. Chook

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN MORTENSON et al., Respondents, v. NOAH CHOOK, Doing Business as EAST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

Mortensen v. Chook

Fulton did not plead as an affirmative defense that the named assured breached the provisions of paragraphs 3…