From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morse v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 7, 2022
645 S.W.3d 722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84558

06-07-2022

Brandon Scott MORSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Samuel Buffaloe, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and Garrick Aplin, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


Samuel Buffaloe, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and Garrick Aplin, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, and Alok Ahuja and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Brandon Morse appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief, wherein Morse alleged claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided the parties an unpublished memorandum of law explaining our ruling. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Morse v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 7, 2022
645 S.W.3d 722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Morse v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brandon Scott MORSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jun 7, 2022

Citations

645 S.W.3d 722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)