From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morse v. County of Sonoma

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 8, 2005
Case No. C05-01119 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. C05-01119 WHA.

November 8, 2005

JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN# 76043), JULIE M. HOUK (SBN# 114968), Law Offices of James B. Chanin, Berkeley, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

BONNIE A. FREEMAN, Attorney for Defendants, County of Sonoma.

AMANDA UHRHAMMER, Attorney for Defendant, Noel Garza.

GREGORY G. SPAULDING, Attorney for Cross-Defendant, County of Sonoma.


STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDUCE AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON


THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, DO HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT pursuant to the settlement agreement between the parties, the entire action shall be voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morse v. County of Sonoma

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 8, 2005
Case No. C05-01119 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2005)
Case details for

Morse v. County of Sonoma

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE LEE MORSE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SONOMA, a municipal corporation…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Nov 8, 2005

Citations

Case No. C05-01119 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2005)