From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morse v. C.G. (In re C.G.)

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jun 24, 2021
2021 N.D. 113 (N.D. 2021)

Opinion

20210132 20210133

06-24-2021

In the Interest of C.G., a child Stephanie Morse, L.M.S.W., Buffalo Bridges Human Service Zone, Petitioner and Appellee v. C.G., child; Respondent and R.M., father; B.G., mother; Respondents and Appellants In the Interest of K.K., a child Stephanie Morse, L.M.S.W., Buffalo Bridges Human Service Zone, Petitioner and Appellee v. K.K., child; B.K., father; Respondents and B.G., mother; Respondent and Appellant

Tonya Duffy, State's Attorney, Valley City, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Ashley K. Schell, Williston, N.D., for respondent and appellant B.G.; submitted on brief. Leah R. Carlson, West Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant R.M.; submitted on brief.


Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.

Tonya Duffy, State's Attorney, Valley City, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Ashley K. Schell, Williston, N.D., for respondent and appellant B.G.; submitted on brief.

Leah R. Carlson, West Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant R.M.; submitted on brief.

PER CURIAM.

[¶1] B.G. and R.M. appeal from a juvenile court order terminating their parental rights to C.G. and K.K. B.G. is C.G.'s and K.K.'s mother. R.M. is C.G.'s father. After hearings in February and March 2021, the juvenile court found the children were deprived, the deprivation was likely to continue, and the children had been in foster care for at least 450 out of the previous 660 nights. N.D.C.C. §§ 27-20-44(1)(c)(1) and (2). The court also found that R.M. abandoned C.G. N.D.C.C. § 27-20-44(1)(a). The court terminated B.G.'s and R.M.'s parental rights.

[¶2] On appeal, B.G. and R.M. argue the juvenile court erred by finding there was clear and convincing evidence to terminate their parental rights. After reviewing the record, we conclude the court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in terminating B.G.'s and R.M.'s parental rights. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle  Daniel J. Crothers  Lisa Fair McEvers  Jerod E. Tufte 


Summaries of

Morse v. C.G. (In re C.G.)

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jun 24, 2021
2021 N.D. 113 (N.D. 2021)
Case details for

Morse v. C.G. (In re C.G.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of C.G., a child Stephanie Morse, L.M.S.W., Buffalo…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Jun 24, 2021

Citations

2021 N.D. 113 (N.D. 2021)
961 N.W.2d 302