From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrow v. Town of Bear Creek

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 17, 1931
133 So. 63 (Ala. Crim. App. 1931)

Opinion

6 Div. 790.

March 17, 1931.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; Ernest Lacy, Judge.

James Morrow was convicted for violating a town ordinance, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

L. R. Quinn, of Haleyville, for appellant.

E. B. Fite, of Hamilton, for appellee.


This purports to be an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the circuit court, on an appeal to it, rendered on a charge begun against appellant in the mayor's court of Bear Creek, an incorporated town, for the violation of one of the town's ordinances.

We will only say that, there being no assignments of error, there is nothing for us to consider, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Spence v. City of Tuscaloosa, 19 Ala. App. 231, 96 So. 464.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Morrow v. Town of Bear Creek

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 17, 1931
133 So. 63 (Ala. Crim. App. 1931)
Case details for

Morrow v. Town of Bear Creek

Case Details

Full title:MORROW v. TOWN OF BEAR CREEK

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 17, 1931

Citations

133 So. 63 (Ala. Crim. App. 1931)
24 Ala. App. 223

Citing Cases

Williams v. City of Mobile

It follows that the judgment below must be affirmed. Morrow v. Town of Bear Creek, 24 Ala. App. 223, 133 So.…

Ellison v. City of Talladega

It follows that the judgment below must be affirmed. Williams v. City of Mobile, 34 Ala. App. 178, 37 So.2d…