From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrow v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 28, 1923
97 So. 108 (Ala. 1923)

Opinion

8 Div. 572.

May 31, 1923. Rehearing Denied June 28, 1923.

John A. Lusk Son, of Guntersville, for appellant.

Defendant was entitled to show unfriendly feeling toward him by the witness Hunt, and refusal of this right was reversible error. Yarbrough v. State, 105 Ala. 43, 16 So. 758; Drum v. Harrison, 83 Ala. 384, 3 So. 715; Mitchell v. State, 94 Ala. 68, 10 So. 518; Breckinridge v. Com., 97 Ky. 267, 30 S.W. 634; People v. Worthington, 105 Cal. 166, 38 P. 689; Patton v. State, 197 Ala. 180, 72 So. 401; Rarden v. Cunningham, 136 Ala. 266, 34 So. 26; Jackson v. State, 156 Ala. 93, 47 So. 77; Jordan v. State, 16 Ala. App. 51, 74 So. 864.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

A witness may not be asked on cross-examination if he has been convicted of a crime not involving moral turpitude. Ex parte Marshall, 207 Ala. 566, 93 So. 471.


A cross-examination that tends to show interest or bias of a witness is "relevant to the issue." Ex parte State (Johnson v. State) 199 Ala. 255, 74 So. 366; Whitsett v. Belue, 172 Ala. 256, 265, 54 So. 677; Houston Biscuit Co. v. Dial, 135 Ala. 168, 185, 33 So. 268; A. G. S. R. Co. v. Johnston, 128 Ala. 283, 295, 29 So. 771; Burger v. State, 83 Ala. 36, 3 So. 319; Underhill on Criminal Ev. § 222; 1 Greenl. on Ev. (15th Ed.) § 448 et seq.; 3 Ency. of Ev. 849; 2 Ency. of Ev. 407; 5 Jones on Ev. §§ 828, 901.

There was prejudicial error in the undue limiting of the cross-examination of the state's witness Hunt, where bias or prejudice was sought to be shown. The defendant was not permitted on cross-examination, to ask the witness, "You fell out with this man and his whole family after you were arrested for having a still?" This question, in the use of the words "this man," referred to defendant.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded to that court for further consideration in accordance with this opinion.

Writ granted; reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, SOMERVILLE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

McCLELLAN, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

Morrow v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 28, 1923
97 So. 108 (Ala. 1923)
Case details for

Morrow v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte MORROW. MORROW v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 28, 1923

Citations

97 So. 108 (Ala. 1923)
210 Ala. 63

Citing Cases

Patterson v. State

a. 521; Shirwin v. People, 69 Ill. 55; Richardson v. State, 100 Miss. 514, 56 So. 454; People v. Brehm, 218…

Morrow v. State

Rube Morrow was convicted of grand larceny, and appeals. Reversed and remanded on certiorari granted by…