From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrow v. Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1938
199 S.E. 265 (N.C. 1938)

Summary

In Morrow v. Highway Commission, 214 N.C. 835, 199 S.E. 265 (1938) (per curiam), decedent was engaged in painting a bridge over the Catawba River and dropped his paint brush in the river.

Summary of this case from Hensley v. Caswell Action Committee

Opinion

(Filed 2 November, 1938.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Warlick, J., at January Term, 1938, of IREDELL. Affirmed.

Raymer Raymer for plaintiff.

Chas. Ross for defendant.


Proceeding for compensation under the North Carolina Workmen's Compensation Act.

The Industrial Commission found that plaintiff's intestate was employed by the State Highway and Public Works Commission in painting a bridge over Catawba River. While so engaged deceased dropped his paint brush into the water. Something was said about going into the water to recover the brush, and the foreman told the deceased not to do so. In violation of this instruction deceased pulled off his clothing, went into the river for the purpose of recovering the paint brush, and was drowned. The Industrial Commission found that the deceased had left the usual scope of his employment and was doing something contrary to the command of his foreman and superior, and concluded that the death of deceased did not arise out of the employment and denied compensation.

Upon appeal to the Superior Court the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Industrial Commission were adopted and confirmed. and plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.


There was evidence to support the findings of fact by the Industrial Commission, and the conclusion of the Commission that the injury did not arise out of the employment was upheld by the Superior Court. In this we concur. The judgment below is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Morrow v. Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1938
199 S.E. 265 (N.C. 1938)

In Morrow v. Highway Commission, 214 N.C. 835, 199 S.E. 265 (1938) (per curiam), decedent was engaged in painting a bridge over the Catawba River and dropped his paint brush in the river.

Summary of this case from Hensley v. Caswell Action Committee

In Morrow v. Highway Commission, 214 N.C. 835, 199 S.E. 265 (1938), decedent was employed to paint a bridge over the Catawba River. Contrary to the instructions of his supervisor, decedent entered the river to retrieve a paint brush and drowned.

Summary of this case from Hensley v. Caswell Action Committee
Case details for

Morrow v. Highway Commission

Case Details

Full title:H. S. MORROW, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF R. C. MORROW, v. STATE HIGHWAY…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1938

Citations

199 S.E. 265 (N.C. 1938)
199 S.E. 265

Citing Cases

Sweatt v. Board of Education

Bolling v. Belk-White Co., 228 N.C. 749, 46 S.E.2d 838; Withers v. Black, supra. See also Morrow v. State…

Spratt v. Duke Power Co.

In reaching its ultimate conclusion that Hoyle's disobedience of his employer's rule was not such a departure…