From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrow v. Harroun

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 16, 2014
No. 63399 (Nev. Sep. 16, 2014)

Opinion

No. 63399

09-16-2014

RICHARD DAVID MORROW, Appellant, v. C/O A. HARROUN; C/O ROAM; C/O M. SIERRA; MR. ROGELIO HERRERA, CCS II; MR. DWAYNE DEAL, A/AW; MR. ROBERT LEGRAND, WARDEN; AND JAMES G. COX, DIRECTOR, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from a district court order granting a motion to dismiss in a civil rights action. Sixth Judicial District Court, Pershing County; Richard Wagner, Judge.

This court reviews de novo a district court's order granting a motion to dismiss under NRCP 12(b)(5). Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 228, 181 P.3d 670, 672 (2008). Dismissal will be affirmed when the complaint's factual allegations, even when recognized as true, do not entitle the plaintiff to relief under the claims being asserted. Id.

Having considered appellant's proper person appeal statement and the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed appellant's complaint. Specifically, respondents' alleged misconduct, even if recognized as true, does not establish a violation of a constitutional right. Id.; see Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-84 (1995) (recognizing that a violation of a prison regulation does not necessarily amount to a violation of an inmate's constitutional rights); Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 860 (9th Cir. 2003) ("[I]nmates lack a separate constitutional entitlement to a specific prison grievance procedure."). Accordingly, we

Appellant contends on appeal that the district court should have granted him leave to amend his complaint. Nothing in the record suggests that the district court denied such a request, and given the complaint's detailed recitation of the alleged facts, it is apparent that amendment would have been futile. See Halcrow, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 129 Nev. ___, ___, 302 P.3d 1148, 1152 (2013) (explaining that leave to amend a complaint should be denied if the proposed amendment would be futile).

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty

/s/_________, J.

Douglas

/s/_________, J.

Cherry
cc: Hon. Richard Wagner, District Judge

Richard David Morrow

Attorney General/Carson City

Pershing County Clerk


Summaries of

Morrow v. Harroun

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 16, 2014
No. 63399 (Nev. Sep. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Morrow v. Harroun

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD DAVID MORROW, Appellant, v. C/O A. HARROUN; C/O ROAM; C/O M…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 16, 2014

Citations

No. 63399 (Nev. Sep. 16, 2014)