From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrow v. Graham

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-28

In the Matter of Neb MORROW, III, Petitioner, v. Harold D. GRAHAM, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Neb Morrow, III, Petitioner Pro Se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff Of Counsel), for Respondent.


Neb Morrow, III, Petitioner Pro Se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff Of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County [Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.], entered May 18, 2012) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier II hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.


Summaries of

Morrow v. Graham

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Morrow v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Neb MORROW, III, Petitioner, v. Harold D. GRAHAM…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 28, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 1642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4933
967 N.Y.S.2d 863