From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrow v. Argent Mortgage Securities, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 14, 2006
Civil Case No. 06-cv-00597-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 06-cv-00597-REB-CBS.

September 14, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The matter before me is the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#13], filed August 9, 2006. The magistrate judge ordered plaintiff to show cause on or before September 8, 2006, why his claims against the Boulder County Public Trustee should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect timely service and failure to prosecute. As of the date of the instant order, plaintiff has filed no response to the show cause order. I concur with the magistrate judge's recommendation that such failure should precipitate a dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff's claims against the Boulder County Public Trustee.

The magistrate judge has recommended also that plaintiff's claims against defendant Argent Mortgage Securities, Inc., be dismissed for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted.

This standard pertains even though plaintiff filed his request to rescind the settlement agreement while putatively acting pro se. Morales-Fernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That recommended disposition of this action set forth in the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#13], filed August 9, 2006, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That defendant Argent Mortgage Securities, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss [#4], filed May 1, 2006, is GRANTED;

3. That plaintiff's claims against defendant Argent Mortgage Securities, Inc., are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted;

4. That judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendant, Argent Mortgage Securities, Inc., and against plaintiff, Lawrence L. Morrow, as to all claims and causes of action asserted in this lawsuit;

5. That defendant, Argent Mortgage Securities, Inc., is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1;

6. That plaintiff's claims against defendant, the Boulder County Public Trustee, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to effect timely service of process and failure to prosecute;

7. That defendant, Argent Mortgage Securities, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Judgment [#8], filed June 29, 2006, is DENIED AS MOOT; and

8. That defendant, Argent Mortgage Securities, Inc.'s Motion for Forthwith Order of Dismissal [#11], filed June 29, 2006, is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

Morrow v. Argent Mortgage Securities, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 14, 2006
Civil Case No. 06-cv-00597-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Morrow v. Argent Mortgage Securities, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE L. MORROW, Plaintiff, v. ARGENT MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., and…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Sep 14, 2006

Citations

Civil Case No. 06-cv-00597-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 14, 2006)