From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrissey v. Nextel Partners

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Albany County
Feb 19, 2009
22 Misc. 3d 1124 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)

Summary

In Morrissey, the court found that the definition for a term undefined in one agreement (“bonus minutes”) could be pulled from another agreement signed the same day between the same parties, and that that definition was found to be consistent with the overall intent of the parties.

Summary of this case from VoiceAge Corp. v. RealNetworks, Inc.

Opinion

February 19, 2009.


Actions — Class Actions — Class Certification.


Summaries of

Morrissey v. Nextel Partners

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Albany County
Feb 19, 2009
22 Misc. 3d 1124 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)

In Morrissey, the court found that the definition for a term undefined in one agreement (“bonus minutes”) could be pulled from another agreement signed the same day between the same parties, and that that definition was found to be consistent with the overall intent of the parties.

Summary of this case from VoiceAge Corp. v. RealNetworks, Inc.
Case details for

Morrissey v. Nextel Partners

Case Details

Full title:Morrissey v. Nextel Partners, Inc

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Albany County

Date published: Feb 19, 2009

Citations

22 Misc. 3d 1124 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 50260

Citing Cases

VoiceAge Corp. v. RealNetworks, Inc.

The language of the AMR–WB Agreement is clear: if the AMR–WB patents are used, then payments must be reported…

Morrissey v. Nextel Partners

The order denied plaintiffs' motion for, among other things, class action certification. Morrissey v Nextel…