From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morriss v. Georesearch, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 27, 1962
298 F.2d 442 (5th Cir. 1962)

Opinion

No. 19182.

January 25, 1962. Rehearing Denied March 27, 1962.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Benjamin C. Dawkins, Jr., Judge.

James A. Van Hook and Hargrove, Guyton Van Hook, Shreveport, for appellants.

Timothy E. Kelley, Dallas, Tex., L.W. Richey, Jena, Thompson, Knight, Wright Simmons, Dallas, Tex., Gaharan and Richey, Jena, La., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.


Upon careful consideration of the contentions made by the appellants, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court was correct for the reasons set out in the able opinion written by the District Judge.

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the trial court. See D.C., 193 F. Supp. 163.


Summaries of

Morriss v. Georesearch, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 27, 1962
298 F.2d 442 (5th Cir. 1962)
Case details for

Morriss v. Georesearch, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Herbert A. MORRISS, Jr., and George C. Howard, Appellants, v. GEORESEARCH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 27, 1962

Citations

298 F.2d 442 (5th Cir. 1962)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. H & E Equip. Servs., Inc.

Notably, the dissent opinions in Neeb-Kearney and Benham would have found good cause for termination. These…

Neeb-Kearney and Co. v. Rellstab

[I]f a person is not achieving the results for which he was hired, whether it be due to incompetency,…