From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 16, 2013
No. 4:09CV1961 JCH (E.D. Mo. Oct. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 4:09CV1961 JCH

2013-10-16

WINSTON G. MORRISON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on petitioner's "motion to vacate or amend judgment obtained by fraud upon the court" under Rule 60(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion is denied.

On December 21, 2009, the Court denied petitioner's petition for writ of audita querela because petitioner's only avenue for relief was under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In his motion for relief from judgment, petitioner does not put forth any argument to the contrary. Nor has petitioner alleged any facts that demonstrate fraud upon the Court.

"A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made within a reasonable time-and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) no more than a year after the entry of the judgment or order or the date of the proceeding." As a result, petitioner's motion is untimely. Moreover, the motion has not set forth any facts demonstrating that petitioner is entitled to relief.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's "motion to vacate or amend judgment obtained by fraud upon the court" [ECF No. 16] is DENIED.

JEAN C. HAMILTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Morrison v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 16, 2013
No. 4:09CV1961 JCH (E.D. Mo. Oct. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Morrison v. United States

Case Details

Full title:WINSTON G. MORRISON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 16, 2013

Citations

No. 4:09CV1961 JCH (E.D. Mo. Oct. 16, 2013)