From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jun 5, 2003
No. 03-03-00039-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 5, 2003)

Opinion

No. 03-03-00039-CR.

Filed: June 5, 2003. Do Not Publish.

From the District Court of Bell County, 27th Judicial District No. 53,057, Honorable Martha J. Trudo, Judge, presiding. Affirmed

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices KIDD and PATTERSON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant Chavon Monique Morrison pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.02 (West 2003). The district court assessed punishment at imprisonment for fourteen years. Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, who was advised of her right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Morrison v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jun 5, 2003
No. 03-03-00039-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 5, 2003)
Case details for

Morrison v. State

Case Details

Full title:Chavon Monique Morrison, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Jun 5, 2003

Citations

No. 03-03-00039-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 5, 2003)