From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 28, 1996
227 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 28, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Targum, J.).


The IAS Court correctly held that plaintiff, who was assaulted by an unknown person in the lobby of a building owned and maintained by defendant after leaving the apartment of a tenant who was a customer, failed to come forward with any competent evidence that his assailant was able to gain access to the building because of defendant's negligent failure to maintain the locks on the building's front door. "[T]he failure to provide locks on outer doors is only pertinent as an alleged proximate cause if there is evidence to support a finding that the assailant was `an intruder * * * with no right or privilege to be present there'" ( Dawson v. New York City Hous. Auth., 203 A.D.2d 55, quoting Miller v. State of New York, 62 N.Y.2d 506, 509).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Morrison v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 28, 1996
227 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Morrison v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MORRISON, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 28, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 688

Citing Cases

Frederick v. 550 Realty Heights, LLC

Those statements indicate that the decedent knew the assailants and permitted them to enter the building's…

Borrero v. New York City Housing Authority

In a negligence claim based on lack of security which allowed the perpetrator access to the building, absent…