From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. Lloyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1945
269 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

October 15, 1945.

Present — Close, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ.


Cross actions to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage as a consequence of the collision, in a street intersection, of an automobile operated by plaintiff Morrison and owned by plaintiff Mead, with a truck owned and operated by defendant Lloyd. Judgment in favor of plaintiffs Morrison and Mead, entered on the verdict of a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The court did not err in its charge. Neither car was "in the intersection or so near as to render it likely that a collision would occur" on either version of the incident ( Shea v. Judson, 283 N.Y. 393). In any event, if error there was, it was not prejudicial. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 106.)


Summaries of

Morrison v. Lloyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1945
269 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Morrison v. Lloyd

Case Details

Full title:LEONA MORRISON et al., Respondents, v. ALBERT W. LLOYD, Appellant. ALBERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)