From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. Just

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 6, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1544 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1544 DAD P.

July 6, 2010


ORDER AND FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed May 24, 2010, plaintiff's second amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

Also, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Morrison v. Just

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 6, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1544 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Morrison v. Just

Case Details

Full title:CLAY MORRISON, Plaintiff, v. D. JUST, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 6, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1544 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)